Townes Van Zant:
"If I needed you would you come to me,
Would you come to me, and ease my pain?
If you needed me
I would come to you
I'd swim the seas for to ease your pain
In the night forlorn the morning's born
And the morning shines with the lights of love
You will miss sunrise if you close your eyes
That would break my heart in two
The lady's with me now since I showed her how
To lay her lily hand in mine
Loop and Lil agree she's a sight to see
And a treasure for the poor to find "
Would you come to me, and ease my pain?
If you needed me
I would come to you
I'd swim the seas for to ease your pain
In the night forlorn the morning's born
And the morning shines with the lights of love
You will miss sunrise if you close your eyes
That would break my heart in two
The lady's with me now since I showed her how
To lay her lily hand in mine
Loop and Lil agree she's a sight to see
And a treasure for the poor to find "
"Loop and Lil were parakeets." --Townes Van Zant
215. The American woman has
been far more successfully shaped by the American
matrix than the American man—the
resulting American
male is, from the perspective of creating a perfect Number (cf. Zamiatin), a great failure.
This is completely obvious to
the American woman. Look at her smile—it is a smile of victory. It is not a
smile of innocuous joy—even the smile has been programmed, Pavlovian, to occur
in the context of reading the public transcript of the dominant class. To watch
Ron Paul debate a 30 year old woman--her smiles occur at moments when she has
perfectly recited the public narrative. It is one thing to say a culture’s
women have been degraded (selling themselves to prostitution, for example, as
Sorokin describes after WWI in Russia),
yet another to say a culture’s women are now dangerous, lost, mutant, the soul of a zombie, the womb of whore, her firm ass jiggling in leggings no different than a streetwalking whore. A man must sleep with
the enemy to sleep with ‘his’ women. A man must wander willingly into this pit of zombies all the while pretending to enjoy his favorite beverage as these atrocities gnaw the flesh from his neck, smile, refuel on their cellular devices. This is the great, great secret—this is
the hidden transcript which is certainly unmentionable. Man need look no further for such a droning enclosure of hell.
216. Surplus as an attitude, but the common construct goes as follows: When
humans no longer directly worked for what they ate and how they were sheltered,
when activity, living, and survival were broken apart—man became sick and lost
his way. The sickness manifested itself in many forms, but is mostly
characterized by organized human coercion in various degrees—powerful systems
of human coercion which modify or coerce (some might say control) the thoughts,
feelings, and activities of human beings. Money has been but one way man has done this, and clearly it is the relevant topic for men attempting to live amidst the zombies and the men who have constructed the charade of money.
The concept of surplus is
identified. Commonly used in American matrix language, surplus implies an
excess of some thing, or the difference between what is needed and what is
present. According to this way of looking at man's sickness, the concept of time is
critical here. If the need is a day of food, yet a man has 10 days of food,
there is surplus, and, according to the men who identify surplus as the original sin, this surplus qua surplus is the cancer that has ruined it all for man--murdered his spirits, attacked the earth. If the need is one year of food, and there are 10 days of
food, there is no surplus. Let us point to the moose and whale and remember a moose and whale, to use the language of the matrix, 'bought man time.' Yet was there a risk this disconnection of living and effort--this temporary leisure, would so lead man astray, or would it take a certain type of man to abuse an abundance--use it to enslave other men rather than for his own leisure?
With the whale, hunter-gatherers
encountered what is the technical definition of surplus in its sense above—an excess, a difference between what is present and what is needed. Yet immediately the definition
is clear—the intersection of wants and means. Time—a concept which may be very
different among cultures (and that is to say that this concept could not be intelligible to all cultures) provides
pressure to the concept of want. Inuit did dry meat and also did preserve and
ferment walrus and seal. Fuel lamps burned whale, walrus, and seal fat. Inuit
did not wander aimlessly, grateful at any animal hunted. Rather, time and
planning was involved in their culture—the construction of an igloo, tent, or
lodge; construction of weapons; preparation of food and storage of food;
preparation of clothes. Purity was violated even with the Inuit as man was
never truly like the other animals. And hence man needed a grounding to mend each day he was not quite animal and not quite of the earth--his helping and hurting spirits were offered by the earth and its animals to guide man to not sin. Without his spirits, man would do nothing right--man would be sin made manifest. He needed clothing—especially in the
arctic. And his clothing came from several animals. Unlike other animals, arctic
man—to the distinction of men living in warm weather—needed clothing, needed
protection from the elements. He needed to construct shelter. He needed to
create spears, arrows, nets, knives, needles, thread. Yet he shared many things
in common with the other animals, yet the animals looked upon man as the weakest of those who wandered. Man always needed help; indeed man was pitied by the animals.
217. Surplus: it is the result of a
way of looking at the world. It is a vantage point, the result of a species of
man. Surplus has always existed in the world, if we want to use the term of the
anthropologists, because the idea of surplus—stored value which can be traded
for scarce or non-existent items—is a well-used concept of the anthropologists. The original sin, this vantage point which struck and killed the spirit of man in a violent lightening, is embedded in the word itself
We can look to the first group of anthropologists who have used this term to
describe what they call ‘progress’ or 'complexity,' but we end up explaining a
way of looking at the world with the very tools that are products of this
vantage point. To get man out of his hole of misery we have to get back to the
problem of when man first looked at the earth and did not see the earth
beautiful and full of wonder and energy—what some men call the gods and spirits
in conjunction with the earth. At one point man’s world was one—his mountain the spirits, his rivers the spirits—and there were no gods, there was
no earth. Separating ‘earth,’ ‘god,’ and ‘man’ is already a degraded vantage point,
and this is the problem to be solved.
So rather than beating the same
problem that will not get us anywhere if this false problem is to be solved, we
will first state the clear and obvious matter that surplus is the great distraction
of anthropology, that anthropology’s attempt to retrace the origin of
complexity can be of no use if it is to already have as its vantage point the
very first taint of man in his attack against the earth.
Yet to many this vantage point is intractable—they
say that we first must come to terms with complexity and its product, surplus,
and then find a way to somehow avoid either the temptations of surplus or the
creation of surplus or, perhaps, focus on areas of the earth where ‘surplus’
has a hard time finding its way due to the conditions of the earth, such as with the Eskimo in the North, where,
again, the anthropologists will use the economic term of ‘scarcity’ (apparently
the counterpoint of ‘surplus’) to describe an environment where things do not
get out of order because they have a hard time getting out of order due to the
extreme environmental conditions which do not attract, encourage, or foster what the
anthropologists call 'surplus.'
But what must be recognized is
that there are species of men who look at the world in a different way than
other men. Some men do not see earth as a problem to be solved, some men do not
see the earth as something to be reshaped, transformed, and processed into
something else. We shall set aside this species of man and note that we will
not say that these men do not create surpluses because we have already
identified the idea of surplus as an idea that originated from a species of man
that has already attacked and transformed the world. Once man has hurt his
earth, he must do something with his mess, he must do something with his sickness.
He then transforms the earth into more things, more problems, more
complications (the key here is complication—a problem—not complexity). These
men can then note that these transformations of the earth further pollute and mutate
mankind and create sicknesses—slavery, government, law, currency,
various degenercies, but most importantly various manifestations of coercion,
domination, and enslavement.
Rather than speaking of how an
already degenerate race of man has damaged his world, let us turn to the race
of men who live with their world and do not attack this world. What sort of man
is this, and how does he live? Does this man live only where he can't get himself into trouble? Or is he a sort of man who, anywhere, would never commit the sin that other men have committed, that other men have stacked and transformed into the atrocities which have hollowed out and culled the soul of humankind? If we want to look at the abundance of the
earth—defined as the earth in its greatest source of power for the forstering
of the greatest well-being of man—we should like to call this the greatest
abundance of the earth, the greatest source of energy, power and happiness. The
earth, in its state before the attack and transformation of a certain species
of humans, is indeed, the greatest abundance possible, completely free of
pollutions,and mutations which the anthropologists call ‘surplus’ and ‘scarcity.’
We must ask: is surplus a result of an
activity or is surplus an attitude?
218. For men to compete with each
other, for the men of finance to maximize their extraction from other men, for
these men to spend the most on each object they touch—but worse, for these men
to idolize their daughters, to spend enormous quantities of money on their
daughter’s health, education, clothing, travel—you have put in an ethereal
realm a creature meant for breeding, cooking, and caring, incapable of genuine
curiosity, greatness, comedy. To create a system of laws to place these feeble
creatures to stand in the way of other men—it is one thing to say the oligarchs
are creating a disgusting result in the quest to control volatility, but what
do we say about these servile men who exploit the labor of other men for the
purpose of fickle wastefulness?
219. A man makes his mistakes when he is lonely for a woman. A man yearns for a
woman. But they have ruined the women, and now a man's yearnings cannot be met
by the mutated creatures which men now mistakenly call “women.“ Matrices are
created to coerce, brainwash, confuse, and enslave men. Matrices coerce men
into routines they would not otherwise undertake. The human race has been
reshaped in exactly the manner a race of men had first launched their attack
upon the earth. Man attacked his earth, and then he attacked his own people,
his own race. The killing of other men does not represent cruelty, yet the
transformation of the natural and instinctive mating and the beautiful and
natural expression of man and woman, manhood and womanhood, the insanity has
then run its course, as a mutated mankind no longer matters in that, such
destroyed, humiliated, transformed, neutered, there is no soul, no song, no
spirit, no force which wishes to be of the earth and animals. The finality of
the matter would be a total decimation of nature. It would be thus that these
mutant creatures, so many generations far from their being men and women, would
have nothing for which to yearn. Why not nuclear war and robot warriors?
Convergence to computer.
Man can choose to be guided by
a wild, free spontaneous earth. Yet man's only natural predator is
himself. Not only does he coerce and enslave other men, he burns man's bridge
to freedom through his attack upon and transformation of earth. In his
reshaping of earth, man kills earth's spirit. Yet man changes earth to kill
himself. It is a weak and sick man who attacks the earth. His attack on
earth spreads his sickness and thus his weakness spreads as a cancer. For some
men, earth is too much. Man thus attacks earth and in doing so kills earth's
spirit and in doing so kills his only source of infinite spontaneity. Without
this spontaneity man is faced with a deadness, and this deadness we call
matrix. Man may have launched his attack on earth for solitary reasons, yet the
fallout of his attack is the slavery of other men through the deadness, the
product of his attack. Sick man deadens the earth around him and in so doing
deadens other men who encounter an earth slaughtered of its spirit. Man then
only knows as vocation this attack upon the earth which further grows the
deadness. Earth and man die together.
220. Nietzsche says that not only
must a man have great insight and genius, he must covey his ideas to other men
and convince other men—he points
directly to speech. It is problematic. On the one hand we can point to the
pre-matrix past of man before his attack on earth and before his wicked tools
of language, text—a mutant, cancerous attack on spirit and earth that has
continued to coerce and enslave men and destroy the human species to an
ultimate convergence to either bomb or computer. And hence, prima facie we
should wish to agree with Nietzche and compel men to be good speakers as they share what may well be liberating. Yet the
result of the matrix is a complete castration of the listening and feeling that
is possible when man has spirit, when man has name, and with his name man
speaks and listens to his helping spirits and wins over or commits warfare
against his hindering spirits. Yet speech must not only be mistrusted but
discarded. The hucksters of hot air blow on the hollowed-out rot of the zombies
which wander the matrix. The solution is text—the very evil which arose from
the original attack on earth and the spirit of man—man must use this evil
against itself, re-writing the software that has coerced his thinking and
doing. Beware of men who thus wish to convince, coerce, or otherwise speak to
other men. They have nothing to share but more blackened poison that will
further entrench man in his zombie state. There will be a man to use a bomb to destroy the bombs, and this man will give text to the world, the world's last text, which, when man has healed, will be discarded.
No comments:
Post a Comment