Saturday, March 29, 2014

How the Inuit Harvest their Spirit Crops for Surplus and Dread

 “The agriculturalist feels alone. Either he is without land and surplus and feels an outcast from life's feast, or he amasses so much surplus as to insulate his lonliness. Before farming men were without themselves, identity was unknown. The inuit took the atiq or spirit of the dead ancestor into them along with his name. How could anyone ever be alone. Even the hunter who starves where the animals do not appear, he dies alongside spirits that give him comfort and knows his atiq will be reborn in a new form. Solitude is perhaps an ignorance. An ignorance of divinity. Man cannot claim himself, not in the presence of a god.” (J. Myner, last known spoken words in English)

"An experience in which one feels, though one cannot intellectually know it, the slipping away of all-that-is into the Nothingness in which it is suspended…” (Sartre, Being and Nothingness)

 “Estimates of the death toll alone, as a result of the

"dekulakization" and collectivization campaigns and the ensuing famine,

range from a "modest" 3 or 4 million to, as some current Soviet figures

indicate, more than 20 million. The higher estimates have, if anything,

gained more credibility as new archival material has become

available.” (Scott, Seeing Like a State)

“They created, in place of what they had inherited,

a new landscape of large, hierarchical, state-managed farms whose

cropping patterns and procurement quotas were centrally mandated

and whose population was, by law, immobile. The system thus devised

served for nearly sixty years as a mechanism for procurement and control

at a massive cost in stagnation, waste, demoralization, and ecological


failure." (Scott, ibid.)

“He has erected a multitude of New Offices, and sent hither swarms of Officers to harass our people and eat out their substance.” (American Declaration of Independence)

"A developed country is one that allows all its citizens to enjoy a free and healthy life in a safe environment." (Kofi Annan, Secretary General of the United Nations)

“…All experience hath shewn that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed.”  (American Declaration of Independence)
 
“In an arrangement later copied in the "strategic hamlets" in Vietnam, the reluctant residents were lodged in identical, numbered houses arrayed in straight lines.

The population's movement in and out was strictly monitored. They

were one short step away from the concentration camps built in wartime

to create and maintain a legible, bounded, concentrated state

space and seal it off as completely as possible from the outside. Here,
direct control and discipline are more important than appropriation.” (Scott, ibid.)

“It would be, Wilson wrote to a friend, the largest mechanized wheat farm in the world. They planned the entire farm layout, labor force, machinery needs, crop rotations, and lockstep work schedule in a Chicago hotel room in two weeks in December 1928.31T he fact that they imagined that such a farm could be planned in a Chicago hotel room underlines their presumption that the key issues were abstract, technical interrelationships that were context-free. As Fitzgerald perceptively explains: "Even in the U.S., those plans would have been optimistic, actually, because they were based on an unrealistic idealization of nature and human behavior. And insofar as the plans represented what the Americans would do if they had millions of acres of flat land, lots of laborers, and a government commitment to spare no expense in meeting production goals, the plans were designed for an abstract, theoretical kind of place. This agricultural place, which did not correspond to America, Russia, or any other actual location, obeyed the laws of physics and chemistry, recognized no political or ideological stance." (Scott, Ibid.)

“The concept of state spaces, suitably modified for the context of a market economy, can also help us to resolve an apparent paradox in colonial agrarian policy in Southeast Asia. How do we explain the decided colonial preference for plantation agriculture over smallholder production? The grounds for the choice can certainly not have been efficiency. For almost any crop one can name, with the possible exception of sugarcane, 17 smallholders have been able historically to out-compete larger units of production. Time and time again, the colonial states found, small producers, owing to their low fixed costs and flexible use of family labor, could consistently undersell state-managed or private-sector plantations. The paradox is largely resolved, I believe, if we consider the "efficiencies" of the plantation as a unit of taxation (both taxes on profits and various export levies), of labor discipline and surveillance, and of political control.” (Scott, Ibid.)
 
“They were described by their would-be civilizers as "not yet arranged" or "not yet ordered" (belum di-ator), as "not yet brought to religion" (belum berugamd), and their cultivation practices were described as "disorderly agriculture" (pertanian yang tidak teratur).” (Scott, ibid.)
 
“After seizing state power, the victors have a powerful interest in
moving the revolution out of the streets and into the museums and
schoolbooks as quickly as possible, lest the people decide to repeat the experience.” (Scott, ibid.)

“I believe we ought not to speak of the weaknesses of very great men.”
(Lafcadio Hearn)

"He would go to libraries and read books. Feel something literary, he thought. He would read books from the shelves. He would sit on comfortable chairs. When he needed water, there was a drinking fountain. From the windows he could see the rain. The sky rained and it fell to the green grass and fed the thick green moss on the headstones. Sometimes when he went to the library he was inspired. Other times he fell asleep. He felt sad about the man who was born on the Greek isle. According to the book, he was born to a Greek mother of noble lineage and his father a soldier. Her brothers didn't like his father, and one night they attacked him with knives and left him for dead. She found him and hid him in a barn. She nursed him back to health. They eloped and were married. The marriage was consummated. Two boys were born. He moved her from the isle to England, and she lamented of the rain and the strange language and her isolation. Her cousin came for her and she left the two boys and the soldier. She married her cousin and and returned to the isle. His father remarried but gave him to a relative. He would never see again his brother, his father, or his mother.

It affected the way he lived, this past of his. He would see each new person in his life as a god, like his mother, a Greek goddess. His love knew no boundaries. But no one he met possessed such a capacity to love, no one on earth could see gods in each man and woman. And so he would feel betrayed, incredulous and bludgeoned that those in his life could not feel as he did. And so he would disappear from their lives, never to be seen again.

Toward the end of his life he had a Japanese wife and lived in Japan. It struck me as odd that he chose a Japanese woman because his first love was a Norwegian. Love was different then, or at least for him. It was a 4 day train ride to Ohio from the East coast and he had already gone 38 hours without food, just breathing the smoke from the 3rd class car full of immigrants. She sat across from him, 18, blonde hair wrapped in a blue bonnet. How could such an angel be put in such a cattle car? It wasn't out of his timidity but out of his shame and hunger that he did not speak to her. The Jewish man sitting to his right saw into him. "You like her, no, don't you?" He was enraged the man could be so forward in speaking to him about such a personal matter; doubly enraged that the man found him so obvious."You should say something to her," he said. 

 
The train moved on and his hunger resonated in his mind. He saw her coming towards him in a blur. She handed him a large piece of brown bread with a slice of yellow cheese. He devoured the bread and cheese and then realized he had not thanked her. Can food be more important than a Norwegian angel? In haste he thanked her, but she spoke nearly no English. Her face became crimson and washed with rage. He said something terrible and now they were at war. The Jewish man intervened with his slight command of Norwegian yet she was not open to negotiation. She turned her back on him and he never spoke to her again.
 

In his last days his health was very poor, afflicted with a cough and the failing eyesight of his only eye. "Maybe she knew I only had one eye," he thought. He never stopped thinking of the Norwegian girl, even in Japan, she appeared everywhere. To think now she is old, tending to her grandchildren, it didn't matter where he was. It could have been back on the Greek isle. She was the only woman who had a light brighter than his mother. In all places he was without her, her face, her blue bonnet. What had he said to her? Why did she turn away and suddenly hate him? He still loved her because he knew she could love him even more than he could love her.

He was nearly blind and without energy. He would sleep after his fits of coughing and when he would wake there was little he could see--to work, to type his remaining lectures he had to assume his hands could write as they had always. He had resigned his post in Japan but his offer to lecture in America had been reneged due to a typhus outbreak. He abandoned the last of his friends, this time not due to their incapacity to love but rather due to self-preservation. He had no energy, no feeling left, save the last few sparks which were devoted to his final book.

The book was finished. If he could not lecture in the United States, he could publish the lectures in a book. He held his book. She appeared with her golden hair wrapped in her blue bonnet and her blue eyes that saw his hunger. "I love you," she said.""
--Saint Maximin, his best recollection from The Life and Letters of Lafcadio Hearn, Elizabeth Wetmore, Houghton, Mifflin, 1906.   


(Maximin noted the text had never been checked out since its publication 108 years ago. The library was closed due to Spring Break and Maximin, in a hurried state to share the Life and Letters of Lafcadio Hearn, wrote down what he could, as best he could remember, indulging at times in important detail neglected by Elizabeth Wetmore Houghton, a known author.)







Tuesday, March 25, 2014

The people's blindness

"Those who have put out
the people's eyes
reproach them
of their blindness."
John Milton, 1642

Sunday, March 23, 2014

Ska

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O-a8kLtJSJ4

Siren woman

Roberta, o meu amor.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DotSYrNGYxg

Wednesday, March 19, 2014

February












Icefields

It would have been fruitful to ‘capture’ some of the ideas, but they are fleeting, like the delicate creatures that live in the bottom of the ocean. To go after them would be to destroy them, to spook them. The abyss is terrifying for some. All men face fear, all men face anxiety. Even the Eskimo—when he faces a wind of 60mph, when he faces cold of -50F, when he faces a white out—a man can die in such conditions, and if he dies, I cannot imagine—is this man hunting alone—that is to say, is this man hunting only for himself? Or is this man part of a band? Does he have a son waiting for him? It makes a difference because death may be peaceful if a man is doing what he wants and is not burdened by a horizon. Is the man on a voyage far across an ice plain? Does he wish to see the other side? Perhaps he could be at peace that he dies while moving across his ice plain, dying with so many friendly voices, dying with so much good ice. Yet what if the man had not yet made friends with his ice and the voices? What if all this man thought about during his whole journey was ‘the other side’? What if the other side is all the man wants? Wanting is an affliction. So much is around a man for all of what is around him to be his friend. The affliction of the white man, his great psychosis is a project, a goal—and all else before the man is seen by him as lost, or a journey but not the goal, a series of phenomena that will occur along the way (the journey) that must conquered, overcome, but do not themselves constitute ‘the objective.’ Objectives, goals, purposes, projects—this western mindset is an excellent form of living suicide—all else dies, all else is murdered, all else is sacrificed as irrelevant. A man must have goals, objectives, some project. A man must be a demon and a bastard to all that inhabits the now and live only in the objective, that white, silent hollowing cancer, the killer of childsouls, the apologist of the destruction of forests, beaches, the theme songs of wars, office buildings, it is the chlorine gas cancer of the west, and it is what makes The West precisely what it is. Let these men and women have their projects and goals until their graves. The white man speaks of his struggle as he carries his body over vast stretches of land? What is his struggle, what is he worried about? Why is the white man so unhappy? Why does he wish to destroy everything in his path and catalog what remains? So what if he does not reach the other end of the great ice field. He makes such a fuss about everything. He will be silent when he freezes.

Running running

First I ride the bike to Springfield. It not easy to follow river like you think, man. River go all over up and down. I ask a hair-lady to help me and she tell me to go one way but that was no good. I ask a guy from 7-11 with lots of fried grease and other shit on his shirt to help me and he help me. He tell me I gotta get my ass up the big hill. I get my ass up the big hill. I put on the chip for the foot and the number for the race so they know who I am when I win. Man the race start and we go to cross muddy swamp. 5k trail, 5k road. But the guy with the funny outfit he don't run so fast that I can't catch him. So I catch him. Running, running. Then he keep running and we get to mile 1. Running, running. I get bored so I go real fast and pass the guy with the outfit. Running, running over the rocks and the trees and all kinds of shit man. I pass the 5k point and the race announcer say I'm some Irish guy but how the fuck he know nothing about me man? Fuck him. I running and now this part on the road so I figure I go real fast, balls-ass. No fucking way man. Big hill, 2 minutes, then ballsass fast downhill, then the guy don't be real clear for the hairpin but I only lose a few meters on the strange guy who now lead. Same bad hill. I catch my breath. Now we got 2 miles and I figure if I can mark funny guy I'll take him out with 400m to go. Running, running, I follow. Left leg don't feel so good. I figure we have 800 meters, but shit, I see the finish, and mister funny costume put the gas down and I running for him now. Fucker got me by 4 seconds. But you should see his clothes, man. Fuck him man. Fuck that cockaroach.

Friday, March 14, 2014

The Curiosity of Leggings-as-Pants


There has been great mystery in the explosion of leggings-as-pants. Leggings are thicker tights which had traditionally been worn under a dress or with a tunic. Historically, leggings were covered; historically, it had been unthinkable to wear leggings as pants, uncovered. To older generations, leggings-as-pants were “hot pants” or “hooker pants.”


Yet college women are wearing leggings-as-pants as men and women wear t-shirts. Very few are saying very much about this. From the male perspective, free, open, rational speech has been long dead on university campuses-especially, especially as it relates to ‘gender.’ Long, vile, primitive mating habits, sex characteristics, millions of years of evolution, have been overcome by proper doublethink. But the obvious state is that on college campuses, women are wearing tight, revealing hot pants. Not some of them, nearly all of them.
This could be marked as another fashion trend, like short skirts, tight jeans, cleavage. Leggings-as-pants, as clothes, constitute fashion. But the preponderance of the fashion is far more significant than emergence of other trends in color or style.
There were four theories, each of them meriting consideration, which we will review. First, college women are laying their bodies on the line because of intense sexual competition. In order to compete for alpha males, women must now leave nothing to the imagination. The display of the crotch and the jiggling ass is the last frontier. (A bikini, followed by total nudity, indeed, is the ultimate frontier.)
Second, among women’s literature (viz., the internet) there is a tendency to describe leggings-as-pants as convenient and comfortable. This, too, is accurate, as leggings are generally cheap, easy to wash, and match with most accessories.
Third, leggings-as-pants are an advancement of body-positivity or body-affirmativity. Women, by displaying their bodies, are in effect claiming and asserting their bodies (and, indirectly, their sexuality).
Fourth, leggings-as-pants are another example of intra-sexual competition, or women’s competing against women. Women with fine asses can use their fine asses to compete against other women. This benefits women with naturally fine asses and also benefits women who are fitness enthusiasts to show off their hard work. There is nothing quite more humiliating to other women than to a) have a highly revealing fashion standard that is now de rigueur, and b) require one’s body to be in near-perfect physical shape to be considered flattering in such attire. For college women, the ass is something which can be easily covered. There are many ways to hide an unfit gluteus. With leggings-as-pants, there is nowhere to hide.
These theories are reasonable, but they fail to take into consideration this sudden and intense display of the female body—it should be reminded that these leggings, once called hot pants, were typically used by prostitutes because they displayed the female figure immediately and left nothing to a man’s imagination. There has not, however, been a radical change in competition for alpha males, desire for comfort, or a radical shift in body-positive or body-affirmative clothing. What theory best accounts for this paradigm shift of clothing?
I offer that the provocative display of the body is simply the entry of a new class of women who had for many years, perhaps centuries, perhaps millennia, not been able to flaunt their bodies to attract men. This is the class of women who do not have large breasts to display. Men like displays of breasts because they are an obvious, large display of female beauty and sexuality. It is very easy for a woman with large breast to display cleavage. There is a long history of the display of cleavage that is not associated with prostitution. Hence women with large cleavage were always in the sweet spot—they didn’t have to worry too much about their outfit—simply display cleavage, and the outfit is good to go. It worked well to compete against and humiliate other women—women with smaller breasts can’t display cleavage as easily, if at all. (Men like breasts. Men don’t necessarily have a preference for large breasts, but large breasts are easier to flaunt and display.) Women with cleavage could also ignore other aspects of their body—the lower torso, the ass, the legs.
Smaller breasted women have entered the market aggressively, as if releasing centuries of pent up jealousy and sexual market neglect or exclusion. They have gone right for the balls, too: wear the most revealing pants possible, with no cover. Make these the new jeans. What stops you from wearing them?
Women with unfit asses can’t wear them, although many have indeed taken the plunge. It’s obvious when an ass doesn’t look good in leggings. The effect is immediate.
But it gets better for smaller breasted women. Wearing leggings-as-pants and revealing cleavage is too much. A woman must choose between one or the other—reveal cleavage, or reveal the ass, but not both.
Fit, smaller breasted women have used a new tool to compete in the sexual marketplace: leggings-as-pants. Many men may misinterpret this display of ass as an effect of an increase in sexual promiscuity. While there has been an increase in sexual promiscuity on college campuses, and leggings-as-pants may well represent a ‘sex-positive’ presentation of the female body, the pervasiveness of leggings as pants is not attributable to a liberalization of female sexual mores. Again, it is the competitive entrance of smaller-breasted women into the sexual market place, who are, at the moment, simply displaying their most marketable sexual wares for the first time, because they can. These smaller-breasted women run the gamut—some have very strong, risk-taking sexual appetites, while others possess more restrained sexual appetites. What men must understand is these women are, for the first time, visually displaying what they have to offer in the same way that large-breasted women have always been able to display cleavage. These women may well become more promiscuous because of a marked increase in sexual offers, just as large breasted women have often been more promiscuous because of steady reception of sexual offers.
With a heightened sense of sexual market value, it must be considered that smaller-breasted women may become less promiscuous, as they become more selective. In the past, if a smaller-breasted woman would offer herself to lower-status men due to her structural disadvantage in the fight of cleavage, she now has a structural advantage in ass-display and attracts the attention and advances of many men. Sluts can now be more selective (while continuing to have the same number of partners, only higher quality), and less sexually active women do not have to be sluts in order to play the field—they will now receive attention and advances without their having to offer sex up front. 
The next vanguard will be cleavage and leggings-as-pants. Yet it will require that large-breasted women not settle simply to flaunt their breasts, but also their asses. Ass flaunting requires a fit ass, which requires diet, exercise, or genetic gifts.

Saturday, March 1, 2014

Trapline

"I just wanted to speak about that I got oldest son. He is only ten year old and he got twenty-two squirrels and one beaver and he really was enjoying the trapping and we showed him how to set a trap, how to set a snare. Now he really was happy, I don't know why they were walking about build a pipeline through. If they build a pipeline through some of the people will lose their trapline."

--Chief Metecheah of the Halfway Reserve